Project on Syracuse University Handicap Access Lab Report

Project on Syracuse University incumbrance Access - Lab Report ExampleMaterials The material necessary for the completion of this report included conducting a survey of the different areas of the university premises to find turn up what facilities are accessible to the disable personnel who posit into the premises. The other method used to collect data was interviews. An interview was conducted with the construction supervisor to find out on their plans to make their designs accessible to disabled personnel. Collected data Lot Name Total floating policy Handicap Spots ADA Requirement Within Requirement? (Yes or No) Arch Strip 28 28 2 2 Yes Adam Street Garage 301 7 8 No stalling Garage 365 8 8 Yes Brockway 26 0 2 No Brewster Boland Garage 196 2 6 No Day/Flint 134 5 5 Yes Dome 34 0 2 No Harrison 60 3 3 Yes Haven 18 1 1 Yes Irving Garage 409 14 9 Yes Lawrinson Garage 154 0 6 No Marion 58 2 3 No Ostrom 58 58 0 3 No Quad 1 154 11 6 Yes Quad2 46 3 2 Yes Quad 3 27 4 2 Yes Quad 4 107 3 5 No Quad 5 21 2 1 Yes Sadler 53 0 3 No Shaw 51 1 3 No Stadium 474 0 9 No University Ave Garage 783 17 15.66 Yes walnut tree West 10 1 1 Yes Washington 5 1 1 Yes Washington weapons 20 1 1 Yes Waverly 109 8 5 Yes Womens Building N/S 105 2 5 No TOTAL 3806 98 Results The data collected as shown preceding(prenominal) indicates that most of the lay lots that the survey was conducted were accessible to persons with disabilities. ... From the research conducted by the author it was found that the south campus does not contrive in disabled spots unless requested by an individual and then they will put a disabled spot near the residence of the person who requested. From the dining hall that is being built in the west campus, there are plans to put disabled spots but there is no way so there will be no likelihood of adding more parking. The construction supervisor should be advised to consider putting in place elevators since the area is not enough for the construction of ramps. From the above chart we gather that only 5.52% of the universitys parking lot is accessible to the disabled personnel. The amount of quadriceps femoris created for handicapped spot should not be much but at least a levelheaded space that is enough. This may not be much or equal but it shows an effort to leave alone the ethical responsibility of the university to the disabled personnel within the premises and outside. According to the design manual- barrier part with (2008), ramps should be conducted in all areas accessible to all kinds of people especially shopping malls, pathway alleys, tenant buildings and even restaurants. The ADA act requires that all landlords should make structural changes to existing facilities to meet their program availableness requirements. This act also applicable to the facilities undertaking constructions and allone is liable to the consequences of breaking the rule. The design manual- barrier free (2008), requires that every facility that offers access to the handicapped to provide ramps to make an ease access of the building. Wheelchair ramps can be permanent, semi-permanent or portable. Permanent and